The State of Franklin: Revolutionary Ideals After the Revolution

In 1784, western settlers created the State of Franklin because they felt neglected by North Carolina’s distant government. Franklin reflected the Revolution’s ideas of self-government and representation, but conflicts with Cherokee communities and internal political divisions led to its collapse. Despite failing, Franklin helped shape the political development of what became Tennessee.

Authored By Warren Dockter, Ph.D. on August 26, 2026

In August 1784, the American Revolution was over or at least the war was.

Only the year before, the Treaty of Paris had formally recognized the independence of the United States. Americans had rejected government from the distant capital of London, proclaimed that political authority rested upon the consent of the governed, and fought a long and protracted war to establish a new nation. But for settlers living west of the Appalachian Mountains,  those principles immediately raised other questions. Issues like who would provide security on the frontier ,who really governed if the government was still far away and unable to enforce its laws, and at what point do people have a right to form a local government.

In August 1784, two hundred and forty-two years ago this month,   delegates gathered at Jonesborough and unanimously supported the creation of a new state made from the western counties of North Carolina. This experiment in state formation and local governance would become known as the State of Franklin. Franklin is sometimes remembered as an historical curiosity, the “lost state” that nearly became America’s fourteenth state. But viewed in the context of the American Revolution, it holds something much more revealing. Franklin demonstrated that the political ideas unleashed by the Revolution did not simply stop when peace was declared in 1783.

The people of the western Appalachian settlements had good reasons to feel remote from their state government. The Mountains separated them from North Carolina’s political center, communications were difficult, and settlers believed that officials who lived along the coast in the east could hardly represent or administer their interests. It was unfeasible that they could  adequately provide courts, aby realistic type of defense, or really be responsive in any way. When North Carolina voted in 1784 to cede its western territory to the national government, western settlers suddenly faced uncertainty about what would be come of them.

Their answer was a familiar one. They would govern themselves.  At this meeting in August , they elected their own state officers. The governor was to be the famed and Revolutionary war hero John Sevier,  Landon Carter was chosen as the Speaker of the Senate, Thomas Talbot was selected to be the State Clerk, and William Cocke  was to be the leader of the planning committee. It was Cocke who was sent to the Continental Congress to plead for statehood. The impulse for self-government echoed the arguments Americans had made against Britain only a decade earlier. Government existed to serve the people. Political communities possessed rights of their own. When existing institutions failed to represent local interests, people could create new local and therefore accountable ones.

In addition to creating elected officials,  the Franklin government created three original counties in which they could collect taxes: Washington County, Sullivan County, and Greene County. However, by 1786 the Franklin legislature created four new counties: Wayne County (present day Carter County), Spencer County (later renamed Hawkins County), Caswell County (later formed part of Jefferson County) and Sevier County. A fifth county,  named for William Blount was added in a different session.  Its constitutional debates even raised questions about who should be permitted to hold political office. The temporary government reduced or eliminated some of the property qualifications which had been inherited from North Carolina, demonstrating how quickly revolutionary ideas about political participation were moving even along the frontier.

The State of Franklin also revealed the limits of revolutionary liberty. The western settlers’ assertion of their rights to self-government existed alongside an aggressive effort to occupy lands claimed by the Cherokee. Franklin officials negotiated the Treaty of Dumplin Creek (1785), which opened more  south of the French Broad River but Dragging Canoe’s faction of Cherokee refused to recognize. The was also not recognized by the US Federal Government because it was in conflict with the subsequent Federal Treaty of Hopewell (1785).  As a result, the Federal government demanded some 3000 settlers leave Cherokee lands. The State of Franklin completely ignored the federal treaty which created to further violence between settlers and the Cherokee and even sparked a notion that Franklin might join with the Spanish empire.

The unsettled issues of the frontier highlighted the fact that Franklin itself was not united. Many western residents continued to recognize the government of North Carolina. Rival governments, courts, and officials operated in the same communities. The dispute eventually became a bitter political struggle between Sevier and John Tipton, culminating in armed confrontation called the Battle of Franklin. By 1789, the Franklin movement effectively collapsed.

But the idea behind it did not disappear. North Carolina eventually ceded its western lands to the United States in 1790. These lands became the Southwest Territory, and six years later the people of the region achieved, through the federal system, much of what the Franklinites had attempted on their own. On June 1, 1796, Tennessee entered the Union as the sixteenth state. The State of Franklin therefore belongs to the history of the American Revolution not merely its aftermath.

The Revolution had proclaimed powerful ideas about representation, popular sovereignty, and the right of people to shape their own governments. Franklin showed how those ideals continued to work themselves out long after the fighting had ended. In the mountains and valleys of what became East Tennessee, the language of self-government took on new meaning as settlers confronted the realities of life on the frontier. At the same time, Franklin exposed the limits and contradictions of those revolutionary principles, particularly when the settlers’ claims to liberty and self-determination collided with Cherokee sovereignty and land rights. The State of Franklin ultimately failed, but the ideas that inspired it did not. They continued to shape the political culture of the region and, eventually, the creation of Tennessee itself. In the Appalachian mountains, the Revolution’s ideals were still being tested  around the notions of  who would govern and on what terms.

 

More News

See All
East Tennessee 250th

Independence in the Backcountry: What July 1776 Meant in East Tennessee

While Americans celebrate July 4, 1776, as the birth of the nation, the story of independence unfolded very differently on the Appalachian frontier. In what is now East Tennessee, settlers and Cherokee communities faced years of conflict, diplomacy, and uncertainty as the American Revolution reshaped the region. This article explores how the fight for independence was experienced beyond Philadelphia, where the meaning of freedom was forged in frontier cabins, forts, and contested lands.

East Tennessee 250th

From Frontier to Statehood: Tennessee at 230

As Tennessee marks the 230th anniversary of its admission to the Union, it is worth remembering that statehood was neither simple nor inevitable. From the failed State of Franklin to the creation of the Southwest Territory and eventual statehood in 1796, Tennessee’s story reflects the challenges and opportunities of building a new nation on the Appalachian frontier.

East Tennessee 250th

Order, Diplomacy, and the Making of East Tennessee

After the Revolution, East Tennessee remained a volatile frontier where the U.S., the Cherokee, and settlers all claimed authority. The 1791 Treaty of Holston tried to bring order, but its promises quickly unraveled—even as it marked the moment when the region’s political foundations began to take shape.